Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Steady state (or not)

This page moves from pictures of spins to numbers: the signal magnitude over time, the steady-state signal against flip angle, and the role of ϕ0\phi_0. Two tissues are compared:

Source

1. Signal over time

The plot shows ∣sn∣|s_n| over the first 1000 TRs (10 s). Quadratic and gradient-only spoiling both flatten out into a steady state, although gradient-only settles at the wrong value. Random phases keep fluctuating around the Ernst line for as long as you look. Zoom into the last few hundred TRs to see it clearly.

Source
Loading...

2. Signal against flip angle

This is the plot behind variable-flip-angle T1T_1 mapping. For each flip angle, it shows the steady-state signal (quadratic, gradient-only) or the range the random scheme wanders over (shaded band: 5th–95th percentile of ∣sn∣|s_n| over 500 TRs taken after 1000 TRs of preparation; solid line: its mean).

Source
Loading...

The CSF panel’s y-axis is clipped so the Ernst curve stays readable. The gradient-only curve keeps climbing off the top (double-click the panel to autoscale). Note the difference between the orange line and the orange band. The mean of the random scheme tracks Ernst best of all. But a single TR, and therefore a single k-space line, can land anywhere in the band.

3. The knob: choosing ϕ0\phi_0

The quadratic scheme has one free parameter. The plot shows its steady-state signal relative to Ernst for every ϕ0\phi_0 from 0° to 180° in 1° steps (ϕ0=0\phi_0 = 0 is gradient-only spoiling). The shaded orange band is the random scheme’s 5–95% range for comparison.

So the quadratic scheme is stable but its bias depends on ϕ0\phi_0 and T2T_2, which is why quantitative methods either calibrate for it or correct it (Preibisch & Deichmann, 2009).

Source
Loading...